1 Chronicles 4:32

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And their villages were, Etam, and Ain, Rimmon, and Tochen, and Ashan, five cities:

Original Language Analysis

וְחַצְרֵיהֶם֙ And their villages H2691
וְחַצְרֵיהֶם֙ And their villages
Strong's: H2691
Word #: 1 of 8
a yard (as inclosed by a fence); also a hamlet (as similarly surrounded with walls)
עֵיטָ֣ם were Etam H5862
עֵיטָ֣ם were Etam
Strong's: H5862
Word #: 2 of 8
etam, a place in palestine
וָעַ֔יִן and Ain H5871
וָעַ֔יִן and Ain
Strong's: H5871
Word #: 3 of 8
ajin, the name (thus simply) of two places in palestine
רִמּ֥וֹן Rimmon H7417
רִמּ֥וֹן Rimmon
Strong's: H7417
Word #: 4 of 8
rimmon, the name of five places in palestine
וְתֹ֖כֶן and Tochen H8507
וְתֹ֖כֶן and Tochen
Strong's: H8507
Word #: 5 of 8
token, a place in palestine
וְעָשָׁ֑ן and Ashan H6228
וְעָשָׁ֑ן and Ashan
Strong's: H6228
Word #: 6 of 8
ashan, a place in palestine
עָרִ֖ים cities H5892
עָרִ֖ים cities
Strong's: H5892
Word #: 7 of 8
a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)
חָמֵֽשׁ׃ five H2568
חָמֵֽשׁ׃ five
Strong's: H2568
Word #: 8 of 8
five

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Judah's expansion and conquest section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term נַחֲלָה (nachalah) - inheritance is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting God's faithfulness in land promises.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Genealogies of Judah's clans and territorial expansions. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection